| Is a Bonfire Architecture? |
 |
After
the death of twelve students in the 1999 bonfire accident at Texas A &
M, authorities questioned what regulations should apply to temporary structures.
Should a bonfire be governed by the same laws as an office building or a
bridge?
Article
by Jackie Craven
|
Build a house, and you have
to get a permit. Build a bridge, a tower, or any large public building, and
the plans must pass muster with a team of engineers. Builders must arrange for
inspections and supervision before beginning projects that involve public safety,
health, or welfare. That's the law in the United States and most areas around
the globe.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Free Newsletter |
Get updates to the architecture site and discussion forum
via email. Subscribe
now.
|
|
![]() |
But, what if you're constructing
something else? It's as big as a house, but it's not a building. People climb
it, but it's not a tower. Years of planning go into its design, but it is only
a temporary structure. In fact, it will be destroyed within days after its completion.
Is it still architecture? Should it be governed by the same laws as an office
building or a highway overpass?These are the types of questions first year architecture
students toss around in classroom debates. But this fall, the questions aren't
merely hypothetical -- They lie at the heart of investigations into the fatal
collapse of the bonfire structure at Texas A&M.
The four-story high log pile
was not designed to be used as shelter. Although as many as 70 people were walking
on top of it, the structure was not intended to serve as a bridge or an observation
tower. The Texas A&M Bonfire was not functional but ceremonial: It was built
to be burned.
The Texas State Engineering
Practice Act does not specifically mention wooden log piles such as the A&M
structure. College officials say that the log pile is exempt because it is not
a public building and it is constructed by volunteers. However, members of the
state engineering board are taking a new look at the construction law to see
whether a bonfire structure should follow the same regulations as buildings
and bridges.
What's your view? Is a large
structure designed for ceremonial burning architecture? Should the construction
abide by the same laws as public buildings?
Text
copyright © Jackie Craven
|